Creator
Removal Review

Provider evidence profile · Reviewed November 8, 2026

Fanlock: removal data and public reviews

Public coverage, creator experiences and supporting Google data for Fanlock.

Telegram, social and impersonation coverage

Telegram removal

Max includes Telegram requests and follow-up; access to private groups is not assured. Official source.

Category cases and limitations

Social-platform removal

Pro and Max include eligible social reports. Instagram links are submitted by the creator; the dedicated guide says Instagram scanning is not provided. Official source.

Category cases and limitations

Impersonation account removal

X and Telegram clone scanning; eligible Instagram reports from submitted links. Plan and reporting basis determine coverage. Official source.

Category cases and limitations

Supporting Google evidence

Highest mean and median removals per recorded owner in this cohort, with a 95.01% removal rate. It leads when per-owner output receives the largest weight.

Fanlock · Google rank 1 of 9 under this directory’s historical model · 73.75 / 75 Google points

Fanlock — reconciled Google outcomes
MeasureObserved value
Mean removed / owner ID32,128
Median removed / owner ID19,287
Recorded owner IDs283
Removed / submitted95.01%
Removed URL occurrences9,092,241
All submitted URL occurrences9,569,936
Not in index274,136
No action134,973
Pending68,586

What this result means

The denominator is 283 recorded owner IDs. These are not independently verified unique paying creators, and the observed reporting history begins in February 2026.

Observed submissions run from 2026-02-01 to 2026-11-04. Owner IDs are not independently verified unique creators, and removed URL occurrences do not mean unique files or source-site deletions. Read this directory’s weighting formula.

Public creator evidence

The supplied blossom_moonlight story favors Fanlock over Rulta. A public Sailor Scholar review also describes a positive experience. Neither establishes an audited comparative result.

14 selected names were recorded from the provider’s site, including BriSolo, NatyLikesPizza, RexChu, MissMercyy, Sailor Scholar. A website feature is not proof of a current subscription or an independent endorsement.

Requested names in the reporting data

Audit featured names and audience evidence · Creator reporting dates and totals

Agency feedback and workflow

named vendor-published testimonial

Agency identity, roster size and outcomes have not been independently corroborated.

Advertised tools: Roster dashboard, Creator-specific access, Account manager.

Provider’s agency source page

Platform turnaround

No comparable measured platform turnaround is available. The Google export has submission dates but does not supply outcome timestamps. This category is unscored.

Source trail

Attribution groups 24 self-reported reporting IDs by observed brand/legal aliases. It does not independently authenticate every submitter.

Primary Google reporting profile · Provider entity map · Every reporting ID and status total

Back to the creator directory · Compare for an agency