Telegram removal
- Ceartas
- Fanlock
- Traqeer
Messages, channels and groups must be counted separately.
Read the cases and sources →The agency service directory · Reviewed November 8, 2026
Best OnlyFans DMCA takedown providers for agencies
Find the service that fits your Telegram, social and impersonation cases. Check who handles discovery, filing, follow-up and confirmed outcomes.
Google snapshot through November 4, 2026 · Public posts and testimonials · No creator interviews
Compare by removal outcome
Telegram, social posts and fake accounts.
Choose the category that matches the problem. Start with the published cases, then check coverage and plan limits.
Social-platform removal
- Ceartas
- Fanlock
Posts, media items and disabled accounts are different outcomes; report each platform separately.
Read the cases and sources →Impersonation account removal
- BranditScan
- Ceartas
- Fanlock
Count verified fake-account disabling separately from copied-post removal.
Read the cases and sources →Providers are listed alphabetically, without numbered positions or category winners. Comparable performance evidence is not available. Other providers remain in the coverage comparison; missing published cases do not demonstrate poor service. Google is supporting evidence only.
Supporting Google benchmark
Per-owner output carries 50 points (30 mean + 20 median); removal rate 25; total volume 0. Reviews, comparative switches and turnaround account for 25 proposed points that remain unscored.
The Google export does not identify agency-managed rosters. This is a shared removal benchmark; named agency feedback and team workflow claims appear separately below.
Inspect the formula and its limits →Browse the evidence
Compare the Google records.
Different Google metrics, different leaders
Among these nine services in the supplied all-time snapshot. These are search-delisting measures, not category winners for Telegram, social platforms or impersonation.
Highest mean removals per recorded owner
Fanlock
32,128 URL occurrences
Highest removed-to-submitted percentage
Leakless
95.66%
Largest total removal volume
BranditScan
331,614,833 URL occurrences
Recorded owner IDs are not verified individual creators; counts can include repeated URLs. Customer mix, case difficulty and time in service differ. The weighted benchmark below combines these measures under the disclosed formula.
9 services shown · Google benchmark rank. Sorting changes the view, not the published rank.
01
Fanlock
Leads the current Google benchmark
32,128Mean removed / owner
95.01%Removed / submitted
73.75Google points / 75
Visit site ↗Full evidence profile →9,092,241 removed URL occurrences
What the evidence shows
Highest mean and median removals per recorded owner in this cohort, with a 95.01% removal rate. It leads when per-owner output receives the largest weight.
Keep in mind: The denominator is 283 recorded owner IDs. These are not independently verified unique paying creators, and the observed reporting history begins in February 2026.
named vendor-published testimonial
Median: 19,287 removed / owner. Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observed submissions: 2026-02-01 to 2026-11-04.
Google reporting profile · All reporting IDs02
BranditScan
Largest total removal volume
17,482Mean removed / owner
62.84%Removed / submitted
34.44Google points / 75
Visit site ↗Full evidence profile →331,614,833 removed URL occurrences
What the evidence shows
Largest total Google removal volume in the cohort and the second-highest mean per recorded owner. Those strengths support its position in the weighted benchmark.
Keep in mind: Its all-time removal rate is 62.84%. The large and longer-lived reporting pool is not directly comparable to a small creator roster without considering tenure and client mix.
No named agency review located on the page checked
Median: 2,324 removed / owner. Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observed submissions: 2020-10-07 to 2026-11-04.
Google reporting profile · All reporting IDs03
Traqeer
630 recorded owner IDs
4,389Mean removed / owner
94.43%Removed / submitted
28.92Google points / 75
Visit site ↗Full evidence profile →2,765,285 removed URL occurrences
What the evidence shows
A 94.43% removal rate supports its weighted result, alongside 4,389 mean removals per recorded owner.
Keep in mind: Its total recorded removal volume is smaller than the largest providers. Provider-published audience counts for featured creators have not been independently verified.
No named agency review located in accessible content
Median: 1,173.5 removed / owner. Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observed submissions: 2022-06-11 to 2026-11-04.
Google reporting profile · All reporting IDs04
Ceartas
5,982 recorded owner IDs
9,098Mean removed / owner
76.50%Removed / submitted
28.67Google points / 75
Visit site ↗Full evidence profile →54,424,314 removed URL occurrences
What the evidence shows
A 76.50% removal rate and 9,098 mean removals per recorded owner support Ceartas in the weighted benchmark.
Keep in mind: The 1,013.5 median is substantially below the mean, indicating an uneven distribution. Its creator-collective and agency case claims use measures that are separate from this Google dataset.
named vendor-published testimonials and a collective case study
Median: 1,013.5 removed / owner. Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observed submissions: 2021-04-15 to 2026-11-04.
Google reporting profile · All reporting IDs05
Rulta
22,106 recorded owner IDs
7,818Mean removed / owner
72.82%Removed / submitted
26.75Google points / 75
Visit site ↗Full evidence profile →172,833,764 removed URL occurrences
What the evidence shows
Second-largest total removal volume in the cohort, with 7,818 mean removals per recorded owner and a 72.82% removal rate.
Keep in mind: Its 22,106 recorded owner IDs form the largest denominator here. Long-lived and mixed owner records can pull an all-time average away from the experience of an active individual creator.
named vendor-published testimonials
Median: 1,201 removed / owner. Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observed submissions: 2018-10-26 to 2026-11-04.
Google reporting profile · All reporting IDs06
Leakless
Highest removed-to-submitted rate
765Mean removed / owner
95.66%Removed / submitted
24.93Google points / 75
Visit site ↗Full evidence profile →111,744 removed URL occurrences
What the evidence shows
Highest all-time removal percentage in this cohort at 95.66%. This is a useful distinction for readers prioritizing that single measure.
Keep in mind: It has 111,744 recorded removals across 146 owner IDs, giving a mean of 765. Its smaller observed volume limits what the high percentage alone can tell us.
No named agency review located on the page checked
Median: 289.5 removed / owner. Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observed submissions: 2025-11-29 to 2026-10-10.
Google reporting profile · All reporting IDs07
Bruqi
3,485 recorded owner IDs
9,816Mean removed / owner
49.26%Removed / submitted
24.42Google points / 75
Visit site ↗Full evidence profile →34,208,539 removed URL occurrences
What the evidence shows
Third-highest mean removals per recorded owner at 9,816, ahead of Ceartas and Rulta on that single measure.
Keep in mind: Its 49.26% all-time removal rate reduces its weighted score. A different weighting would change the order; the published formula makes that tradeoff explicit.
No named agency review located on the page checked
Median: 2,837 removed / owner. Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observed submissions: 2023-06-20 to 2026-11-04.
Google reporting profile · All reporting IDs08
Sidenty
1,262 recorded owner IDs
1,246Mean removed / owner
82.72%Removed / submitted
21.85Google points / 75
Visit site ↗Full evidence profile →1,572,040 removed URL occurrences
What the evidence shows
An 82.72% removal rate and 1,246 mean removals per recorded owner provide a measurable Google reporting record.
Keep in mind: The median is 9 removals per recorded owner, far below the mean. This distribution makes the average a particularly limited description of a typical owner record.
No named agency review located in accessible pages
Median: 9 removed / owner. Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observed submissions: 2022-01-18 to 2026-11-04.
Google reporting profile · All reporting IDs09
Lock Leaks
113 recorded owner IDs
2,217Mean removed / owner
72.28%Removed / submitted
20.71Google points / 75
Visit site ↗Full evidence profile →250,563 removed URL occurrences
What the evidence shows
The all-time snapshot contains 250,563 removals, averaging 2,217 per recorded owner, with a 72.28% removal rate.
Keep in mind: The cohort contains 113 owner IDs. A higher rate in the recent-window analysis is a different measure and is not substituted into this all-time ranking.
Agency page could not be retrieved
Median: 550 removed / owner. Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observed submissions: 2023-11-28 to 2026-10-29.
Google reporting profile · All reporting IDsYour side-by-side comparison
Select two or three services above to compare their recorded outcomes.
Build a repeatable workflow
Check the service against your roster.
Prepare
Ask what ownership and authorization information the provider needs and how it will protect that information.
Submit
Ask how the service selects the destination, checks the request, and records the submission.
Follow through
Agree who handles rejections, repeat uploads, and cases that remain unresolved.
Ask for separate creator authorization, staff permissions, creator-specific exports and a full roster quote. A vendor testimonial can help identify questions, but it is not a measured agency result.
Agency evidence · checked 2026-11-08
What named agencies say.
Six named agency testimonials were located across three vendor sites. These are attributed summaries, not interviews or independently verified results. Roster sizes were not verified, so no agency-size bonus is assigned.
Fanlock
named vendor-published testimonial
- Lost Media · 2026-08-19
Praises leak detection, responsiveness and updates for its creators.
Advertised agency tools: Roster dashboard, Creator-specific access, Account manager.
Agency identity, roster size and outcomes have not been independently corroborated.
Source pageRulta
named vendor-published testimonials
- Aura Modeling
Praises communication and support.
- Palette Media
Praises proactive support and monitoring across its creator roster.
- Patty Cakes Agency
Credits protection with preserving content exclusivity and supporting sales.
Advertised agency tools: Per-creator reports, Staff and creator access, Prorated roster changes.
Testimonials have no displayed dates, audited sales attribution or verified roster sizes.
Source pageCeartas
named vendor-published testimonials and a collective case study
- ELYSM
Praises automation and time saved managing protection.
- Profile Mgmt Agency
Praises speed, monitoring and leak removal.
- Sidemen / Side+ · creator collective case study
Ceartas claims over 700,000 leaks removed and a 43% reduction in IP threats over six months.
Advertised agency tools: Unified reporting, Creator access, Volume pricing.
The Sidemen result is a vendor case claim, not a comparable Google-only figure or a management-agency review. Animated zero counters were not treated as data.
Source pageBranditScan
No named agency review located on the page checked
Advertised agency tools: Roster tools, Team permissions, Safelists, Consolidated billing.
Business logos and creator merch photos are not agency reviews. Homepage studio testimonial attributed to Kira Noir is kept separate; the studio is unnamed.
Source pageTraqeer
No named agency review located in accessible content
Advertised agency tools: Roster pricing, Dedicated support.
Named creator testimonials on the homepage are not agency testimonials.
Source pageBruqi
No named agency review located on the page checked
Homepage contains creator testimonials; no separately attributable agency review was found.
Source pageLeakless
No named agency review located on the page checked
Advertised agency tools: Shared billing, Roster dashboard, Account manager.
An early agency product description is not customer-outcome evidence.
Source pageSidenty
No named agency review located in accessible pages
Creator page has an unpopulated Reviews section in the text view.
Source pageLock Leaks
Agency page could not be retrieved
Homepage mentions agency workspaces. Named reviews remain unverified; this is not evidence that none exist.
Source pageAdditional business evidence: a public Trustpilot review by “kevott,” dated June 21, 2026, describes Fanlock use at Wifeysworld. This is a studio/business review, not an identified management-agency review. Review source.
Creator names, audiences and service histories
Who appears in the public records?
These reporting associations answer a narrower question than “who is a current customer?” They show which selected service submitted Google requests for a matching owner name. Audience figures below are third-party counters and are not yet applied to scores.
| Creator / audience evidence | Services in the selected Google profiles | What we can conclude |
|---|---|---|
| Sophie Rain 8,895,533 Instagram followers Audience source · 2026-11-06 | Rulta 2023-06-20 → 2026-11-03 | Rulta filings run from June 2023 through November 3, 2026. Other submitters, including profiles named Sophie Rain, also appear; they are not authenticated clients or confirmed moves. |
| SweetieFox 4,634,414 Instagram followers Audience source · snapshot date not stated | Ceartas 2024-11-01 → 2026-11-03 Fanlock 2026-02-06 → 2026-11-03 | Fanlock starts in February 2026, but Ceartas and Fanlock both file through November 3. No evidence in these dates that SweetieFox left Ceartas. |
| Athena Kami 1,589,192 Instagram followers Audience source · 2026-10-26 Suffix variants are shown separately and are not added to the exact-name total. | Ceartas 2026-03-08 → 2026-05-22 Fanlock 2026-05-16 → 2026-11-03 Rulta 2026-10-29 → 2026-11-03 | Ceartas filings end May 22, 2026; Fanlock starts May 16. Rulta starts October 29 while Fanlock continues through November 3. Possible additional or changing representation; no exclusive switch established. |
| Pinkychu 647,077 Instagram followers Audience source · snapshot date not stated Pinkychu is the user-corrected lookup spelling. Pinkchyu is retained as a user-linked candidate alias. Google owner IDs 6247316 and 593882 differ; the identity link has not been independently verified. | Sidenty 2023-11-06 → 2024-03-18 Rulta 2024-06-15 → 2026-09-14 Ceartas 2025-06-09 → 2026-01-18 Fanlock 2026-05-18 → 2026-11-03 | The corrected spelling Pinkychu matches Fanlock owner ID 6247316: May 18–November 3, 2026. The earlier spelling Pinkchyu matches owner ID 593882 under Sidenty, Rulta and Ceartas. If these are the same creator, Fanlock overlaps Rulta through September 14; no exclusive switch is established. The cross-spelling identity link is user-supplied, not independently verified. |
Corrected creator lookup
Pinkychu · Fanlock
73,279 removed / 74,783 submitted · 97.99%, across 316 requests from 2026-05-18 to 2026-11-03.
Reporter 2529688 / owner 6247316. The earlier spelling Pinkchyu uses owner 593882 and is retained as a user-linked candidate alias. The identity link is not independently verified. These requests were already included in Fanlock’s aggregate, so the correction does not change the service ranking. Google reporting profile.
Sophie Rain’s records show Rulta in this nine-service cohort. SweetieFox has overlapping Ceartas and Fanlock activity. Athena Kami has Ceartas, Fanlock and later Rulta activity, including overlap. None establishes a confirmed exclusive switch or the reason for one.
See exact creator totals, dates and owner IDs · Download all 83 creator/service rows
Platform turnaround
Speed needs outcome timestamps.
No comparable, independently measured platform turnaround is available for Fanlock, BranditScan, Ceartas, Rulta, Traqeer, Bruqi, Leakless, Sidenty or Lock Leaks in this evidence set. Google submission dates do not show when a platform completed a removal.
The proposed current platform model assigns 15% to measured turnaround; it remains unscored. Marketing estimates and single-review experiences are recorded as claims, not converted into average response times.
StartRecord a valid submission timestamp.
FinishVerify the outcome and its timestamp.
SeparateGroup Google, hosts and social platforms.
IncludeKeep pending and failed cases in view.
Directory questions
Read the result correctly.
Is this a definitive ranking of every service?
No. It compares nine selected services with stated weights and a dated Google snapshot. Provider suitability also depends on price, coverage, support and source-site outcomes that are not fully measured here.
Why does sorting change the order?
The default uses the disclosed combined model. Sorting lets you inspect one measure, such as removal percentage or median removals. Google benchmark rank labels remain fixed so those two views are not confused.
Do these records prove a creator switched providers?
A later Google record establishes a reporting association. It does not establish an exclusive subscription, cancellation or reason for a change. Overlapping records and candidate aliases remain labeled.
Can I inspect or reuse the calculation?
Yes. The evidence register includes source links and JSON/CSV downloads. The methodology explains normalization, denominators and unscored categories.
Cite this comparison
A snapshot you can trace.
Creator Removal Review. “OnlyFans DMCA takedown.” Evidence reviewed 2026-11-08; Google export through 2026-11-04. Interactive directory edition.
Source register and downloads · Provider entity map · Calculation method
These editions use one shared research register. They are not independent endorsements. Rankings apply to the stated model and snapshot.